|
|
|
| Value Alignment Effect in Human-AI vs. Interpersonal Interaction: The Moderating Role of Decision Context |
| 1. Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Laboratory for the Mental Health and Crisis Intervention of Children and Adolescents, College of psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This study investigates the value alignment effect in human-AI interactions and its differences from interpersonal value alignment. Experiment 1 (N = 145) employed a single-factor between-subjects (interaction partner: AI vs. human) design. Results revealed that both human-AI and interpersonal value alignment effects existed, with no significant difference observed between them. Experiment 2 (N = 116) incorporated decision context as a moderating variable, using a 2 (interaction partner: AI vs. human) × 2 (decision context: factual judgment vs. value judgment) mixed design. Results showed that in value judgments, the human-AI value alignment effect was weaker than the interpersonal value alignment, while no difference was found in factual judgments.
|
|
Published: 15 April 2025
|
|
|
|
| Cite this article: |
|
LI Qinggong,XU Mengqi. Value Alignment Effect in Human-AI vs. Interpersonal Interaction: The Moderating Role of Decision Context[J]. 应用心理学, 0, (): 1-.
|
|
|
|
| URL: |
|
http://www.appliedpsy.cn/EN/Y0/V/I/1 |
|
|
|
